However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. The Defendant is a person who violates the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury resulting from Dangerous Driving) and the Road Traffic Act (drawing driving).

On March 19, 2017, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol 0.117% during blood transfusions, driven a car of the same Au A6-lane 0.17%, and proceeded two-lanes in front of the apartment apartment of the Gangnam-gu Seoul Western-dong, Seoul, with the distance of the Gando, from the distance of the Gando to the distance of the Gando.

In such cases, a person engaged in driving duties has a duty of care to prevent accidents due to a thorough examination of the front section and the left and right, and an accurate manipulation of steering gear, brake system, etc.

Nevertheless, at the time, the defendant's speech and behavior are divided into several parts, walked, and the face color is drunk so as to neglect the above duty of care, and due to the negligence of neglecting the above duty of care, it was received the back portion of the victim C (26 ) who was waiting in the signal waiting at the front side of the same lane, as the front part of the above A6 car.

As a result, the Defendant driven a motor vehicle in a state where normal driving is difficult due to influence of drinking, resulting in the injury to the catum base that requires the treatment of about two weeks for the victim C, and the injury to the victim E (the 26-year-old age), who is the passenger of the said spke vehicle, for about two weeks.

2. The Defendant in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation Act is a holder of BAD A6 passenger car.

No automobile which is not covered by mandatory insurance shall be operated on a road.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, at the same time and place as described in the preceding paragraph, driven a car d A6 car, which is an automobile not covered by mandatory insurance as described in the preceding paragraph.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement 1.3