1. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment as to the Defendant’s grounds of appeal in light of the evidence duly admitted by the lower court, the lower court is justifiable to have found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case (excluding the part on acquittal of the first instance court’s reasoning) on the grounds as indicated in its reasoning. In so doing, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence

2. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in light of the records, we affirm the lower court’s judgment that found the Defendant guilty of the instant facts charged (excluding the part guilty of the first instance judgment) on the grounds that there is no proof of crime, and it did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal.

3. All appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.