beta
(영문) 춘천지방법원 원주지원 2012.10.16 2012고단55

사기

Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for six months, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

Defendant

B The above fine shall not be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A and Defendant B have become aware of while serving as an entertainment drinking house employee, and Defendant B and Defendant D have a marital relationship.

1. The Defendants: (a) conspired to report a traffic accident as if the said vehicle was a traffic accident even though the automobile was not actually involved in the victim’s Hyundai Marine Fire Insurance Co., Ltd. by taking advantage of the fact that the E-Engine driven by Defendant A was subscribed to the victim’s Hyundai Marine Fire Insurance Co., Ltd.; and (b) reported the accident that Defendant A called “on August 13:37, 2009, in front of the Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Seoul Special Self-Governing Province, the Defendant called the victim’s call to the employee of the call center; and (c) even though there was no actual traffic accident, Defendant A sent the said vehicle to the victim’s call center, Defendant A was faced with pedestrians.” (d) Defendant B and D had the said member of the Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and Defendant D had received the treatment by undergoing the traffic accident at the above member.

As such, the Defendants filed a false report on traffic accident damage to an employee of the victim, and subsequently acquired the amount of KRW 950,000,000 from the victim on August 6, 2009, and KRW 335,830,000, including KRW 335,830, as the medical expenses on August 31, 209, by fraud.

2. As above, Defendant A and B conspired to make a false report as if a traffic accident occurred and receive insurance money, and reported the accident to the employees of the call center of the Hyundai Marine and Fire Insurance Co., Ltd. around October 14, 2010, Defendant A reported that the accident was “in the absence of actual traffic accident, who followed the above vehicle, and caused the pedestrian shock.” Defendant B was hospitalized in the above member of the above F, while Defendant B was hospitalized in the above member of the Council on the ground that the traffic accident was caused by the above traffic accident.

The Defendants are employees of the victim.