However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Around 00:20 on December 27, 2016, the Defendant driven a C benz C220 vehicle under the influence of alcohol content of approximately 0.09% from a 1 kilometer section from the Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government New Forest Road to the front road of Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

2. Violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) is a person who is engaged in driving of automobiles Cenz C220.

On December 27, 2016, the Defendant driven the above car on December 27, 2016, and driven the front road of Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government with alcohol concentration 0.09% under the influence of alcohol level 0.09% in blood, the Defendant was driving at one-lane of the four-lane distance of the street park from the surface of the future elementary school to the direction of the distance park.

At the time, since at night and at a remote intersection where signal lights are installed, there was a duty of care to check whether a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle passes through the intersection by reducing the speed and properly examining the side and the left and the right of the road, and to prevent an accident in advance by safely driving the motor vehicle in accordance with the signals, and to avoid driving the motor vehicle in a situation where normal driving is difficult due to drinking.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and even when the vehicle driving signal was under the influence of alcohol, and due to the negligence of entering and proceeding at the intersection, was driven by the victim D (48 tax) who was passing the intersection to the right side according to the green vehicle driving signals from the defendant's moving direction to the right side, and was driven by the victim E (44 tax) by the victim E (44 tax), the right side part of FK5 si on the right side of the defendant's car.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered, from the above occupational negligence, the injury of the victim D, such as a duplic s fage, etc., which intrudes about 6 weeks of medical treatment, and the injury of the victim E, such as four weeks of medical treatment, or four or more duplic cupages of which are in need of more than 4 weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1..