2. The judgment that the defendant recognized the crime of this case, and that the defendant has no record of being punished for the same crime, etc. are favorable to the defendant.

However, in full view of the following: (a) the Defendant acquired money from a victim during a considerable period of time; (b) the nature of the offense is not good in light of the background, method, etc. of the offense; and (c) the amount acquired by the defrauded is not much than KRW 300 million; (b) there is no particular change in circumstances that may be considered in the sentencing after the judgment of the court below; and (c) other terms and conditions of sentencing as shown in the records and arguments of the instant case, including the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, background, method, and circumstance after the offense; and (d) sentencing guidelines for the enactment of the Supreme

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.