2. Although there are extenuating circumstances such as the fact that the defendant can be subject to an administrative disposition such as business suspension, etc. due to the crime of this case, the crime of this case is committed in the place of business operated by the defendant, which impedes his sound growth by selling alcoholic beverages to the juveniles, and it is not less complicated in light of the legislative intent of the Juvenile Protection Act to protect juveniles from various harmful environments including harmful acts so that juveniles can grow into a healthy personality body, and thus, it is urgent for the defendant to defend himself against his mistake, and it is urgent for the defendant to defend himself, and even if the defendant already sold alcoholic beverages to juveniles at the same place on March 22, 2013, even if he had the record of being sentenced to a summary order of a fine of KRW 300,000,000,000 for the crime of this case, there is no other similar case and punishment, the motive and background leading up to the crime of this case, the age and character of the defendant after the crime of this case, and there are many other circumstances presented in the records.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.