beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.10.30 2015고단5630

성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months and by a fine not exceeding 5,00,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From November 2014 to June 23, 2015, the Defendant operated a marina business with the trade name “D” under Article 507 and 508 of the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government building C, and had female employees E, F, G, etc. receive additional charges of KRW 20,000,000 from many male customers in addition to the cost of massage, and caused them to engage in similar sexual intercourse by taking advantage of the hand, which is a part of the body, and neglecting the sexual organ of the said customers.

Accordingly, the defendant committed commercial sex acts such as arranging commercial sex acts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each police suspect examination protocol against the accused and G

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of an alternative sentence of imprisonment and the concurrent imposition of a fine (Article 24 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic);

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. Intermediation of types 2 (such as brokerage, etc. of commercial sex acts by giving and receiving, etc.) (one to three years) in the area of aggravation (one year) (one year and three years), advertisement character or high radio wave of the types of commercial sex acts subject to 19 years of age or older;

2. It is so decided as per Disposition in the same reason as long as the specific reasons for sentencing are small in size, the error is recognized, and there is no record of the same kind in reflectivity.