In full view of the sentencing factors favorable to the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant again committed each of the crimes of this case without being aware of even though he was during the repeated crime due to insult, etc., and the fact that the defendant was punished for the same kind of crime, and that the defendant could have been punished for the same crime, all of the offenses of this case, and the fact that the defendant has agreed with the victim E, and that the defendant additionally deposited KRW 500,000 won at the court below for the victim I and J, each of the 500,000 won at the court below for the victim I and J, and other factors of sentencing that are favorable to the defendant, such as the defendant's age, sexual behavior, environment, the course and consequence of the crime of this case, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence of the court below is judged to be appropriate, and thus, it cannot be deemed unfair because it is too hot or too hot. Thus, all of the unfair arguments of sentencing of the defendant and the

Therefore, the appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since all of the appeals by the defendant and the prosecutor are without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.