도로교통법위반(무면허운전)등
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 2.5 million won.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.
Punishment of the crime
“2017 Highly 1069”
1. On June 20, 2016, the Defendant driving a two-wheeled motor vehicle without a motor device or bicycle driver’s license on the front side of the Manam-si, Sungnam-si, the 125cc ck-cad 2nd, without a motor device or bicycle driver’s license.
2. No person who violates the Guarantee of Automobile Damage Compensation shall operate any motor vehicle which is not covered by mandatory insurance;
Nevertheless, the Defendant operated a two-wheeled automobile with no number plate attached to mandatory insurance at the same time and place as Paragraph 1.
On August 9, 2015, the Defendant damaged the property in which approximately 550,000 won of repair cost would be 55,000 won, such as cutting off a cub car or cutting off a cub by gathering trees in the vicinity of the victim F-owned G, which was parked at the place in the process of physical fighting with the cross-scubing of E and alcoholic beverage on the street in front of the D restaurant located in Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, Seoul.
Summary of Evidence
“2017 Highly 1069”
1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;
1. Reporting on the arrest of a case;
1. "Motor vehicle driver's license register": 2017 High-level 1070 square meters;
1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;
1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E;
1. A written statement;
1. Application of the written estimate statutes;
1. Subparagraph 2 of Article 154 of the Road Traffic Act and Article 43 of the same Act concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 46 subparagraph 2 of the same Act, Article 46 (2) 2 and Article 8 of the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation for Damages Act, and Article 366 of the Criminal Act;
1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment (the defendant's whereabouts are unknown and the defendant intentionally avoided attendance even after receiving a request for summons by telephone, career of the crime reaches 16 times, and the occurrence of the crime in this case shall be determined to be reasonable in light of the circumstances, etc. of the crime in this case);
1. Article 37 of the Aggravation of Concurrent Crimes Act.