손해배상(기)
1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) paid KRW 500,000 to the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) and the Plaintiff’s objection thereto from October 29, 2013 to September 27, 2016.
1. The principal lawsuit and counterclaim shall be deemed to be filed together with the facts of recognition;
A. On October 29, 2013, at least 21:10 on October 29, 2013, the Plaintiff insultingd the Defendant by stating that, in front of the Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C Apartment 304, the Defendant had long left for a long time and did not pay the remainder of the money, the Plaintiff left for a long time with the Plaintiff’s mother, and that there was only the residents, the Defendant stated that the Defendant “Woo Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok. Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok was born, and that it was said that the Defendant Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok ddok
(hereinafter referred to as “instant insult”). B.
On October 29, 2013, around 21:15, the Defendant, at around 21:21:15, 2013, committed assault by the Plaintiff, prior to the above C Apartment 304, with the Defendant’s rear even after the Defendant’s movement to the said money. The Defendant, as seen above, she was frightly sounded to her body, she sees the Plaintiff, who was suffering from the Plaintiff following the Plaintiff’s self-conscept, and she was able to go beyond the normal part.
(hereinafter “instant assault”). C.
Accordingly, on October 21, 2014, the Plaintiff was issued a summary order of KRW 500,000 with respect to the offense of insult by Seoul Southern District Court Decision 2014 High Court Decision 2014 High Court Decision 201Da13952, but the Plaintiff filed a request for formal trial and filed an appeal by a fine of KRW 200,000 with the above court Decision 201 High Court Decision 200,000.
On October 21, 2014, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 500,00 with respect to the crime of assault by Seoul Southern District Court Decision 2014 High Court Decision 201Da13952, and the said summary order was finalized around that time.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of evidence No. 3, significant facts in this court, purport of the whole pleadings
2. Determination on the main claim
A. The Defendant asserted that the Plaintiff’s assertion was sounded to the Plaintiff, and the Plaintiff exceeded the Plaintiff’s body, thereby causing injury to the Plaintiff, i.e., the 6th classical fluent signboard, thereby causing injury to the Plaintiff, which led to the tort by the Defendant.