beta
(영문) 춘천지방법원 원주지원 2016.03.30 2016고단14

도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)등

Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for eight months, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of one thousand won,00,000 won.

Defendant

B The above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A and Defendant B are related to persons.

1. Defendant A

A. On December 16, 2015, the Defendant was driving a Radon car without obtaining a driver’s license from a section of approximately 100 meters from a section of 100 meters to a driving distance from the original fire station of the original city located in the south-ro 487 in the original city around 05:5 on December 16, 2015.

B. On December 16, 2015, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (measures after Accidents) (on December 16, 2015, at around 05:55, the Defendant driven the said radar car and got to turn to the left from the original state medical center on the right side of the original state, with the shooting distance of the original state fire station located at 487 in the south of the original city.

Since a red on-and-off signal has been installed on the front side of that place, in such a case, there was a duty of care to stop the vehicle driving service and prevent accidents by making the front, rear, and left-hand turn after living well.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to turn to the left on the left by the negligence of the Defendant, and went directly from the right edge of the course of the Defendant, to the Won Medical Center of the Victim E (60 S) operated by the Defendant, the driver’s seat part of the driver’s seat of the Plaintiff E (60 S) was shocked with the front part of the said radar car.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by negligence in the course of performing the above duties, did not immediately stop the said car to the extent of 2,759,188 won, such as the exchange of the first rocketing car of the damaged party, and escaped without taking necessary measures.

(c)

After having paid a traffic accident as described in the above B B, the Defendant was found at the home of the principal city C, 302, and the Defendant without the driver’s license. B, as stated in the above B, intended to conceal the fact that he caused a traffic accident by driving the vehicle as stated in the above B, the Defendant told B to make a statement as if he had paid the said traffic accident, and caused B to make a false confession.

Thus, the defendant is around that time together with B.