Defendant

B) On August 29, 2017, around 12:45, 2017, at the D shipment site located in Seo-gu Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon, where the victim D was employed as an employee of the above Center and engaged in the classification work for the delivery of goods, he finds that two cosmetics are displayed in the upper part of the shipment site F, the market price managed by the victim D, which was located in the shipping site F, and suggested the defendant A to steal them, and the defendant A, in response thereto, shall take away goods from the display site using the gap in which E’s surveillance is neglected by the victim’s manager.

L. L. L. L.O. was put in a machine.

As a result, the defendants stolen the victim's property together.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of police statement protocol to E;

1. Defendants of the relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Articles 331(2) and 331(1) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants to be mitigated in small amount: Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act (the following favorable circumstances among the reasons for sentencing);

1. Defendants to be suspended from sentence: Six months of imprisonment;

1. The Defendants of suspended sentence: The grounds for sentencing under Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (refluence of favorable circumstances among the grounds for sentencing) [the scope of recommending punishment] [the grounds for sentencing] [the grounds for sentencing] under Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act, basic area (from June to January 1) (the scope of general larceny) [the sentence] under the following circumstances, the Defendants’ age, sex, criminal conduct, family relationship, family environment, motive and means of the crime, and circumstances after the crime are considered, and the sentence is determined as per the disposition.

The defendants make a confession of the crime of this case and reflects their mistake.

The amount of damage does not exceed 20,000 won.

The damage has been recovered.

Defendants are first offenders who have no previous force of punishment.

It is necessary to strictly punish the defendants' act of theft of property in a joint and several manner.