대여금
1. As to the Intervenor’s Intervenor’s Intervenor’s KRW 32,83,689 and KRW 32,015,566 among them, the Defendant shall start from November 26, 2014.
1. On January 7, 2015, when the lawsuit in this case was pending, the Plaintiff notified the Plaintiff’s successor to the claim that he transferred the loan claim as stated in the separate sheet against the Defendant to the Intervenor succeeding to the claim (hereinafter “Succession Intervenor”). Thus, the Plaintiff’s claim is without merit.
2. Determination as to the claims of the succeeding intervenor
(a)the reasons for the attachment to the indication of the claim and the reasons for participation;
B. Articles 208(3)1 and 257 of the Civil Procedure Act of the judgment without holding any pleadings