식품위생법위반
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) by the court below is too unreasonable as the punishment (one million won penalty) imposed by the court below is too unreasonable.
2. In full view of the various matters, which are the conditions for sentencing in the trial of the judgment party (the case before and after the same type of fine, the case of sentencing similar thereto, etc.), and the applicable sentences, etc., the judgment of the court below is deemed to belong within the reasonable scope of discretion, and there is a change in the conditions of sentencing when it comes to the trial of the party concerned.
Considering the fact that it cannot be seen, the lower court’s sentence is too unreasonable due to the fact that the Defendant’s above assertion is without merit.
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.