The Defendant posted a notice to sell used goods on a bulletin board, such as Internet portal sites, htp:/www.naver.com, etc., and attempted to contact those who reported and contacted with them, and those who posted a notice to purchase used goods, with the Defendant to receive money from them as if they possess used goods.

On February 10, 2015, the Defendant posted a false statement to the effect that “The above NAV car page is sold by a computer, etc.” on the bulletin board, and then sold 240,000 won to the victim C, who contacted the Defendant, for the purpose that “The 240,000 won is sent to a bank account designated within the Republic of Korea.” The Defendant was transferred 200,000 won to the Busan Bank around the 10th of the same month as the price for goods, and 40,000 won from the victim as the price for goods.”

However, even if the defendant receives the money from the victim as above, he did not have the intent and ability to send the money to the victim.

Ultimately, the Defendant, including by deceiving the victim as above and receiving KRW 240,000 from the victim, from February 1, 2015.

7. Until December 24, 200, a total of KRW 16,989,00 was received from the victim as shown in the annexed list of crimes by the same method.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D, E, F, and G;

1. Application of each of the relevant Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 347 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. Among concurrent offenders, there are the same criminal records as the reasons for sentencing in the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act.