The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the evidence duly admitted, the lower court was justifiable to have found the Defendant guilty of the modified facts charged on the grounds stated in its reasoning.

In contrast to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, there were no errors by misapprehending the legal principles on the interpretation and application of Article 15(1)6 and Article 71(6) of the Personal Information Protection Act, constructive consent, and the principle of clarity.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.