위계공무집행방해등
Defendants are not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the Defendants is publicly announced.
1. The summary of the facts charged is as follows: Defendant A is a person who, among the officers of the Korea Veterans Association and the Korea Veterans Association (hereinafter referred to as the "General Assembly"), was dispatched by the labor union to the temporary chairperson of the G church located in the Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Council by the labor union; Defendant C is the head of the same church, who is the facility management chairperson; Defendant B is the head of the same church, and Defendant B is a party clerk.
[Fact-finding] On July 11, 2011, the former E- Labor-Management Association (the Labor-Management Association originally belonging to the General Assembly) that belongs to the General Assembly decided to divide it into “I Labor-Management Association (A)” centered on H pastors and “ENo-Management Association (B)’ centered on J pastors.” On September 201, the E- Labor-Management Council was organized at the 96th General Assembly meeting held around September 201, taking charge of the division of the former E- Labor-Management Council.
With the establishment of the Gu E- Labor Association, 100 churches belonging to the Gu E- Labor Association were divided, all of the church and the joint council were selected in accordance with the autonomous decision-making of each church. The G E- Labor Association also intended to hold a joint council in accordance with the provisions of the articles of association and to take the procedure of selecting a union, but it was impossible to hold a normal joint council due to the irregularities of K, who is a member of the Gu E- Labor Association, and serious conflicts between the believers surrounding it, and it was impossible to choose a union through a normal procedure.
On January 19, 2012, unlike other churches, the representatives of the IE Association and the EM Association agreed to withhold from the division of the Union. The EM Association decided to temporarily suspend the division without belonging to any union.
Nevertheless, around March 19, 2012, the E-EU executives' meeting to which Defendant A belongs will increase confusion, such as unilaterally sending the pastor L to the temporary president of the G church, and presiding at the party meeting. The E-EU subdivision committee has decided that the E-EU's "the G church remains in the position of the union members" and the agreement between the two union members.