However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On July 2, 2018, the Defendant was arrested by the head of the sentence execution office issued on January 29, 2018 at the Defendant’s residence located in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, with the unpaid fine, and was detained in the waiting room for execution of custody in the office of the duty of the Seoul Western District Prosecutor’s Office located in the Seoul Mapo-gu Seoul Western District Prosecutor’s Office located in 174 (Public Defe-dong), around 18:05 on the same day.

At around 18:21 on the same day, the Defendant opened a waiting room for the execution of custody, which was not corrected, and escaped from the outside through the 1st floor of the office.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written statements prepared in D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a copy of the direction for execution of detention in a workhouse, a copy of a sentence execution, or a copy of the direction for execution of detention in a workhouse;

1. Article 145 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting the crime;

1. Circumstances unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the suspended sentence under the Criminal Act: The circumstances that a person detained by law has escaped and the nature of the offense is not good: The recognition of and reflects on the instant crime, the fact that there is no record of being sentenced to a fine or more severe punishment, and all other circumstances that serve as the conditions for sentencing specified in the pleadings of the instant case, including the Defendant’s age, sex, career, home environment, motive for committing the crime, and circumstances after committing the crime;