except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

피고인은 2016. 5. 31. 20:00경 포항시 남구 C에 있는 D 운영의 “E식당”에서 위 D의 동거인인 피해자 F(44세)가 ‘위 D를 더 이상 괴롭히지 말고 만나지 마라’는 취지로 말하였다는 이유로 그곳에 있던 위험한 물건인 당구큐대로 피해자의 머리 부위 및 이를 감싸쥔 피해자의 손가락 부위 등을 수 회 내리쳐 피해자에게 약 5주간의 치료가 필요한 두피의 열린상처, 우측수부 제2수지 근위지골 개방성 골절 등의 상해를 가하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and inflicted an injury on the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to F and D;

1. Photographs of criminal tools;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. In light of the reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, the Defendant’s liability for the crime of this case, the method and risk of assault, and the result of the crime, etc., the following factors are considered as favorable to the Defendant: (a) although the Defendant’s confessions and reflects the Defendant; (b) the Defendant does not want the Defendant’s punishment; and (c) the Defendant does not have any other criminal record, other than a single fine prior to the first fine prior to around 1990, the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, environment, and circumstances after the crime, etc., are considered as favorable to the Defendant; and (d) the