When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On December 3, 2015, the Defendant: (a) knew that the Victim C’s son was detained by his/her own correctional institution, the Defendant introduced a legal office in Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “E”) to the victim’s office; (b) and (c) introduced the E legal office; (d) again, on December 7, 2015, the Victim’s office received a demand for advance payment from the said legal office; (b) provided, “In spite of the fact that the Victim’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’

Summary of Evidence

1. The legal statement of the witness C;

1. On April 12, 2018, the part concerning the statement of the victim in the protocol concerning the interrogation of the police officers;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Details on the check before termination and the check withdrawal;

1. Investigation report (related to a check issued by a suspect), and personal information of the presenters for payment of a check;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports;

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 347 of the same Act concerning the crime, the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;