beta
(영문) 춘천지방법원 강릉지원 2013.04.04 2013고정13

상해등

Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 3,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

The Defendants respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 17, 2012, the Defendant: (a) took a bath to the victim D (the age of 24) (the victim), who was on the street in front of Gangnam-si, Gangnam-si; (b) took a bath without any justifiable reason; (c) the victim took a bath to the victim at one time by drinking alcohol of the victim; and (d) went beyond the victim’s face by hand; and (e) took the victim’s face, and (e) took the victim’s quih with approximately two weeks’ face, the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim, such as dives, boness, boness, and tensions of bones, etc.

2. The Defendants jointly committed the crimes on the grounds that they were subject to the control on the grounds that Defendant A conducted physical fighting with D, such as E (a disposition of suspending indictment on the same day) and G in the circumstances where he was dispatched after receiving 112 reports at the same place as the preceding paragraph on September 17, 2012 and G in the Gangnam Police Station F District, and as in the preceding paragraph from the slope H.

그러던 중 피고인 A의 이모인 피고인 B이 피고인 A을 때리는 것을 목격한 G, H이 피고인들을 제지하자 피고인 A은 “씨발 놈아, 이거 놔 이 새끼야!”라고 욕설하면서 주먹으로 H의 얼굴을 수회 때리고, 계속하여 “씨발놈아, 너 짭새지 이 새끼야!”라고 욕설하면서 주먹으로 G의 얼굴을 수회 때렸다.

As G and H’s voltages Defendant A, Defendant B committed assaulted, such as “G and H’s arms and legs that he was killed and killed,” and she was frighted with G and H’s arms and legs that he was fluored to carry the H’s neck with his hand, and she was fluored with G’s left arms and legs, and E was also fluored with them, and “this dog fluort would not be fluored by any excessive suppression of flus,” while she expressed that “G and H’s arms and legss would be fluored.”

As a result, the Defendants conspired with E to interfere with the legitimate performance of duties by police officers in relation to patrol duty, and at the same time, the victim G (persons 43 years of age) failed to perform a face-to-face inspection that requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment, and the victim H (persons 38 years of age) failed to perform a face-to-face inspection that requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1..