beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 2016.01.12 2015고단5665

사서명위조등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 2015, the Defendant embezzled occupied separated objects with the intention of acquisition without taking necessary procedures, such as discovering a Class 1 driver’s license issued by the Commissioner General of the National Police Agency in the name of the Daegu-si District Police Agency, Daegu-si, Daegu-si, and reporting to the close police station, etc. in order to use them in driving a motor vehicle while the license was revoked.

2. On October 12, 2015, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) and the Road Traffic Act (Dless driving) driving a G Span-type car in the name of F in the name of G Span-type car from the Defendant’s dwelling in Daegu-si C with alcohol content of 0.076% at around 04:50 on October 12, 2015 without a driver’s license.

3. On October 12, 2015, the Defendant illegally used official document: (a) exercised the official document by presenting a first class of driver’s license issued by the Commissioner General of the Daegu Regional Police Agency to B, which was already in possession, as the Defendant was the Defendant’s driver’s license, on the front side of the E-road located in Daegu-gu, Daegu-si; (b) around October 12, 2015, the Defendant was required to present a driver’s license from a slopeH belonging to the traffic safety department of the Daegu-dong Police Station.

4. Around 05:00 on October 12, 2015, the Defendant forged B’s signature with a view to exercising “B” on the part of “B” in the driver column of the primary driver’s circumstantial statement report at the police patrol vehicle parked in E-way located in Dong-gu, Daegu-si, Daegu-si, stated “B” in the driver column of the primary driver’s statement report, and used B’s signature with a view to exercising “B” on the part of “B” in the driver column in the inquiry report as a result of the crackdown on drinking driving. In other words, the Defendant forged B’s signature with a view to exercising the private person on the part of “B” on the part of “B” in the driver column.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Protocol concerning the interrogation of suspect B: