2. In light of the fact that the crime of this case led to the occurrence of the victim of Bosing, and the social harm to the crime of Bosing, there is a need to strictly punish the act of lending the means of access, such as the crime of this case, etc., that is disadvantageous to the defendant.

On the other hand, the fact that the defendant is against the recognition of the crime and is the first offender who has no record of criminal punishment is favorable to the defendant.

In full view of all the circumstances, including the above circumstances, including the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, circumstances after the commission of the crime, and balance with the general sentencing in the same case, the lower court’s punishment is deemed reasonable and unreasonable.

The defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing is not accepted.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.