공상공무원요건비해당결정처분취소
1. On June 14, 2012, the Defendant’s distribution to the Plaintiff of the part of the 's metropium on the part of the Plaintiff.
1. Details of the disposition;
A. On July 1, 2006, the Plaintiff was appointed as a civilian military employee of the Army as a member of the coal agreements with the Army.
B. On December 26, 2008, while performing the duties of recovering and managing carbon, packing materials, high-pollution materials, etc. in the Army as a member of the coal arrangement expenses, the Plaintiff was involved in an accident that re-converts the left-hand booms on the left-hand booms during the transport of the steel bombs that caused carbon boms on January 13, 2009, and applied for registration to the Defendant around September 17, 2010 on the following grounds: “In the course of transporting the steel bombs that caused carbon bombs, multiple pains, combined pain certificate-based, combined bombs, external bombs and bombs on the outside of the bombs, separated bombs and bombs, separated bombs, mental medicine, breast-out, bombs, hair, internal medicine, rehabilitation medicine, etc.”
C. On June 7, 2011, the Defendant notified the Plaintiff of the determination that there is no proximate causal relation between the following injuries and the Plaintiff’s performance of official duties, and that there was no corresponding notification of the determination on the requirements of persons who rendered distinguished services to the State (hereinafter “the first disposition”).
1) 복합부위통증증후군 Ⅰ, Ⅱ : 위 상이는 분쇄골절, 좌멸창 등의 분명한 외상력이 있거나 반복적인 수술에 의한 치료사항이 있으며, 통상적으로 9주 이내에 발생한 경우 공무상 질환으로 인정할 수 있는데, 원고의 경우 수상 후 5개월이 지나 복합부위통증증후군 진단이 나온 것으로, 분명한 외상력이나 반복적인 수술 기록이 확인되지 아니함 2) 좌족근부 외측 발목인대 손상 : 원고의 정확한 병명은 ‘좌측 발목 염좌 및 긴장, 좌측 족관절 전거비 인대 부분 파열’인데, 전거비 인대 파열은 족관절 염좌의 1단계로 염좌와 같은 상병이고, 염좌는 관절의 골절이나 인대의 손상 없이 가볍게 삔 상태로 그 증상이 일시적이며 단기간 치료로 치유 가능하고 일상생활에 장애를 남기지 않으며, 건강보험급여내역 조회 결과 과거력 2003. 5. 31. B병원 '발목 및...