If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

The defendant is a singing practice room business operator who operates a singing practice hall in Bupyeong-si D.

No singing practice room business operator shall sell or provide alcoholic beverages.

Nevertheless, at around 14:30 on October 1, 2017, the Defendant sold to F, etc., a customer, 24 cans, and 2 ben't wel't own, at around 5:6 heading rooms.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of the accused by the prosecution (two times);

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. Application of statutes governing field enforcement photographs;

1. Article 34 (3) 2 of the Music Industry Promotion Act and Article 22 (1) 3 of the same Act concerning facts constituting an offense, and the selection of a fine;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act with regard to the order of provisional payment shall be determined by comprehensively taking into account the following circumstances and the conditions of sentencing as indicated in the records, such as the defendant’s age, occupation, sex, family relation, living environment, circumstances leading to the crime, and circumstances after the crime.

- The defendants have a lot of history of punishment for the same crime.

Finally, on March 30, 2017, the Incheon District Court was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for six months for the same crime, and the decision was finalized on April 7, 2017.

Nevertheless, it seems that the defendant's awareness of compliance is very weak because he committed the crime in this case without any her opening.

- However, the defendant seems to have seriously reflected his fault while living in custody over one month.

- To avoid repeating the crime

The results are as follows.

- Taking into account the fact that the benefits derived from the instant crime are not much available.