When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

1. 피고인 B 피고인은 2017. 4. 19. 22:00 경부터 다음 날인 20. 01:00 경까지 성남시 수정구 F에 있는 D의 주거지에서, 화투 20매를 이용하여 5 장씩을 받으면서 각자 배팅을 하고 3 장의 숫자가 10 또는 20이 되면 나머지 2 장의 숫자의 합이 높은 사람이 이기는 방법으로 수십 회에 걸쳐 속칭 ‘ 도리 짓고땡 ’이란 도박을 하였다.

2. Defendant A and the Defendants engaged in games at the same place in the same day, and pursuant to the rules established by using 48 amblings, and first three points in order for those who acquire three points in the same day, the term “high saw” in several times.

3. The Defendant offered the Defendant’s residence at the same time, at the same place, and at the same time, and upon the completion of gambling, he received a certain amount of honorarium from the person participating in gambling, and provided the Defendant’s residence as indicated in the above 1,2. The Defendant opened a place for gambling for the purpose of profit-making.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;

1. A report on investigation (a photograph of the suspect);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photograph seized articles;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts and the choice of criminal punishment A, B, and C: Defendant D under Article 246(1) of the Criminal Act: Article 247 of the Criminal Act; Selection of a fine and fine;

1. Defendants to be detained in the workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: The following facts are against the Defendants’ reasons for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act; circumstances leading to the gambling of this case; the size of gambling; the amount of money sold; the relationship between the Defendants; and the same criminal records of the Defendants; and other relevant factors of sentencing.