However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On March 20, 2015, the Defendant, at around 06:40, called “E hotel” located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D, that “F was boarding a G taxi in front of the “I convenience store” located in the Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and went back to the road at which the destination was scheduled, and caused F to go back to the road.” On the ground that “F would go back to the road, going back to the road, and will not pay the taxi fee.”

During that, the police officer of the Magjin Police Station who was called up after receiving the report of F F F 112 and received a request from K for the payment of taxi charges, and the Tue expressed the desire to "I am knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee, etc., and continuously arrested as a flagrant offender in the obstruction of the performance of the performance of the performance of the duties, and assaulted L of L of the police box belonging to the J police station and the qui to kne kne kne kne kne kn to kne kne kne kne

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers in relation to 112 reported handling duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to police statements of F, K, and L;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the suspended sentence (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the same Act (Article 62 (1) of the same Act (Article 62 (1) of the same Act does not include the degree of violence, reflect