2. The judgment of the court below is determined by taking account of the fact that the defendant is led to the confession and reflect of the crime, the fact that there is no criminal history of the same kind of crime, the defendant has no substantial profit, and the amount of deception obtained by the planned crime cannot be agreed with the victim because it was impossible to repay the name even in the amount of KRW 200 million, and other factors such as the motive, means and consequence of the crime, the circumstance after the crime, etc., and the sentencing conditions specified in the oral proceedings cannot be deemed to be too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is without merit and it is so decided as per Disposition in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.