근로기준법위반
The defendant is innocent. The summary of the judgment of innocence shall be published.
1. The summary of the facts charged is the representative of the “E” located in the Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D Building 1915, who is an employer engaging in Internet entrance attraction business by 14 full-time workers. The Defendant worked at the above workplace and worked at the above workplace and was on January 31, 2016, paid 90,000 won for retired workers F, and the same year.
2.1.The wage of 730,000 won or more of G workers retired from office around the same year.
2.3.A worker H’s wage of KRW 740,00 has not been paid respectively within 14 days from the date of each retirement without any agreement between the parties on the extension of the due date.
2. The evidence presented in the instant case alone does not appear to have sufficiently proven that the Defendant was the employer of the said worker.
Rather, according to the evidence duly adopted and examined in this court, the defendant is only a representative in his name, and the actual operator of the above E seems to be I.
If so, the facts charged in this case constitute a case where there is no proof of crime, and thus, is pronounced not guilty pursuant to the latter part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the summary of the judgment of not guilty is publicly announced pursuant to