beta
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2018.08.16 2018고정131

상해

Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The Defendant is the victim B (62) and the legal married couple.

On February 12, 2018, the Defendant: (a) was staying outside the dwelling space of the Defendant located in Chuncheon-si, Chuncheon-si, around 13:53 on February 12, 2018; (b) and (c) was missing with the Defendant who returned home.

The booming "the victim's booms by plucking the victim's timber by hand and plucking it over the floor by plucking and plucking it.

The defendant continued to inflict a bodily injury, such as 'multi-malty typology', which requires approximately 2 weeks of medical treatment by taking several times the shoulder part of the victim, which goes beyond the floor.

2. Determination

A. The defendant's argument argues that the victim suffered the upper part of the defendant's face by tending the key, and that the victim's fingers up the victim's hand at the level of defensive action, and that the victim's shoulder did not take part in the victim's shoulder.

B. (1) First of all, we examine whether there is a fact that the defendant has taken part in several times of the victim's shoulder, and evidence corresponding thereto has the victim's investigative agency, the victim's statement in court, and the victim's injury diagnosis report.

However, in light of the following circumstances, the above evidence alone is insufficient to acknowledge this part of the facts charged, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge this.

(1) The defendant asserts that from investigative agencies to this court, the defendant consistently brought the victim's faces over his/her face by tending the key, and that he/she did not take part in the victim's shoulder at the level of defensive action, and that he/she did not take part in the victim's shoulder.

② The victim reported 112 reports immediately after the instant case, and the victim was assaulted by the police officer called out at the time, such as the difference between the Defendant and the victim’s flusium and the victim’s flusium.

The defendant only made a statement, and the defendant took the part of the victim's shoulder;

No statement was made.

However, there is a problem.