고엽제후유증환자등급판정처분 취소
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. Details of the disposition;
A. On May 10, 1966, the Plaintiff entered the Army and was discharged from military service on November 18, 1967 to October 16, 1968, but was discharged from military service on April 26, 1969.
B. At around 2007, the Plaintiff filed an application for registration of actual aftereffects of defoliants with respect to the Hudne heart diseases around 2007, and around 2009, the Plaintiff was found to have been determined to have failed to meet each grade standard as a result of the physical examination.
C. On June 16, 2017, the Plaintiff filed an application with the Defendant for re-verification of a high blood pressure and a dead blood heart disease, and received a physical examination at the Central Veterans Hospital around August 22, 2017.
1) On October 13, 2017, the judgment below the grade criteria was notified as to the high blood pressure. 2) The Defendant, following the deliberation and resolution of the Board of Patriots and Veterans Entitlement, determined on November 21, 2017, that it constitutes “Class 7 5111” as a result of the physical examination of the classification of the injury rating of defoliants, and notified the Plaintiff on November 21, 2017.
hereinafter referred to as "disposition of this case"
D. On July 27, 2018, the Plaintiff filed an administrative appeal with the Central Administrative Appeals Commission, which was dissatisfied with the instant disposition regarding the instant difference, dismissed on July 27, 2018 (the fact that there is no dispute over the grounds for recognition, the entries in Gap’s 1 through 3, 6 through 9, and Eul’s 1 through 4, and the purport of the entire pleadings and arguments.
2. Whether the disposition is lawful;
A. The Plaintiff’s instant difference in the Plaintiff’s assertion is ① Article 14(3) of the Enforcement Decree of the Act on the Honorable Treatment and Support of Persons, etc. of Distinguished Services to the State (hereinafter “Act on the Honorable Treatment and Support of Persons, etc.”) and Article 14(3) [Attachment 3] of the Enforcement Decree of the Act on the Honorable Treatment and Support of Persons, etc. of Distinguished Services to the State, which lost at least 1/3 of the average person’s ability to work, and ② Article 8-3 [Attachment
Nevertheless, the instant disposition that was otherwise determined is unlawful.
(b) as shown in the attached Form of the relevant statutes;
C. Judgment 1 of the Plaintiff’s assertion