When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Even if the defendant is supplied with kimchi to the victim C, it is false that he/she would pay the price of kimchi to the victim on June 15, 201 when he/she was supplied with kimchi on the settlement date, even though he/she did not have the intent or ability to pay the price, and he/she received from the victim the amount equivalent to KRW 1,629,000 from the victim on June 15, 201, he/she received from the victim about 1,629,000 from July 16, 201, as shown in the list of crimes in the annexed sheet.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement (the third trial date);

1. Each prosecutor's protocol of examination of the accused and A (including the statement section D);

1. Each police statement made to D, A, E, and F;

1. A list of the shipment status and transactions;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (Submission of an order to use a mobile phone text message), investigation reports (verification of delivery places on the victim's side), investigation reports (Attachment to the list of damage status of nine cases on the victim's side confirmation of delivery places), and investigation reports (Attachment to the list

1. Relevant Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act and the selection of fines for criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;