총회 재판국 판결 무효확인 등 청구의 소
1. All of the plaintiffs' lawsuits of this case are dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.
Basic Facts
Plaintiff
A was an administrative officer and a member of the G church who belongs to the defendant, and the plaintiffs B and C were the internal collectors and members of the above church, and the plaintiffs D and E were the members of the above church.
Plaintiff
B around October 2013, the G church secretary, and I, who are the members of the above church, filed a complaint on the charge of occupational embezzlement. On November 27, 2013, the Gwangju District Court rendered a decision of two years to suspend the execution of one-year imprisonment with prison labor for the crime that “H embezzled the funds of the above church by means of account transfer or cash withdrawal from January 11, 2008 to April 12, 2013” at the Gwangju District Court, stating that “I embezzled the funds of the above church from January 11, 2008 to April 12, 2013, by means of account transfer or cash withdrawal,” and that I was not subject to a disposition of non-prosecution on the grounds that there was no suspicion in the Gwangju District Prosecutors’ Office (Seoul District Court Decision 2014Da3995).
On August 9, 2015, six members, including G church J, filed a complaint with the Council of the members of the above church, stating that “Plaintiffs were verbally abused, assault, and spread false facts to I and the members of the above church, thereby impairing the honor of the members of the church.”
On October 31, 2015, the party branch of the Gent Assembly rendered a ruling of dismissal and withdrawal from office against the plaintiffs, and the plaintiffs appealed, but the Koman branch of the Koman branch dismissed the plaintiffs' appeal on the ground that the Koman branch of the Koman branch did not prepay the costs of trial and did not pay the costs of trial but 20 days for the appeal period.
With respect to the plaintiffs' appeal, on August 8, 2017, the defendant general assembly trial court ruled that "the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed. The cost of the trial prepaid belongs to the general meeting."
The case F, hereinafter referred to as "the judgment of this case") in the Republic of Korea.
(1) According to Article 75 of the General Assembly Constitution of Korea-Japan, the director of the trial division, despite the fact that there is no dispute, Gap evidence 1 through 3, 8, 9, Eul evidence 9, and Eul evidence 9 (each statement contained in each number, the purport of the whole arguments, and the purport of the plaintiffs' assertion as to the whole.