The execution of a sentence shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On May 2012, the Defendant stated that D’s office located in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, stated that “I will engage in a human test business, and will give KRW 300,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won.”

D) Recognizing that end, the Defendant believed to be this end, and her 8 million won on June 14, 2012 to the account of a national bank account of E in that year, the amount of KRW 5 million on June 15, 2012, and KRW 4.9 million on June 18, 201, and the same year.

7.8.10 million won, including a sum of KRW 27.9 million.

However, because the defendant did not have any property or income, and did not have an apartment in the Gongungdong, there was no intention or ability to repay money even if he borrowed money.

The defendant got the victim D through 27.9 million won by deceiving the victim D.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to D;

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Determination of a suspended sentence under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The sentencing criteria recommended: Imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months and up to one year and six months;

2. Determination of punishment: the original offender and the wrongness shall be recognized;

There is no substantial amount of damage.

However, until now, the damage has not been restored.