For the reasons indicated in its holding, the lower court found the Defendant guilty of the instant facts charged, and ordered the Defendant to restrict employment for one year for child and juvenile-related institutions and welfare facilities for the disabled.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on employment restrictions.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.