(a) Annex 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 of the attached drawings, among the area of 922 square meters in Haan-gun, Gyeongnam-gun, Gyeongnam-gun.

A. On February 5, 1997, the Plaintiff completed the registration of ownership transfer in the future of the Plaintiff with respect to C & 922 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”).

나. 피고는 이 사건 토지 중 별지 도면 표시 ㄱ, ㄴ, ㄷ, ㄹ, ㅁ, ㅂ, ㅅ, ㅇ, ㄱ의 각 점을 차례로 연결한 선내 ㈎ 부분 43㎡ 중 별지 도면 표시 ㄷ, ㄹ, ㅁ, ㅂ, ㅅ, ㅇ, ㄷ의 각 점을 차례로 연결한 선내 부분 지상 목조 스레이트 농어가주택창고(이하 ‘이 사건 창고’라 한다)와 별지 도면 표시 ㄱ, ㄴ, ㄷ, ㄹ, ㅁ, ㅈ, ㅊ, ㅍ, ㅎ, ㄱ의 각 점을 차례로 연결한 선내 ㈏ 부분 76㎡ 지상 철근콘크리트조 스레이트 전업농어가주택(이하 ‘이 사건 주택’이라 한다)의 소유자이다.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1 and 2 evidence, the result of the commission of appraisal to the chief of the Korea Land Information Corporation in this Court, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the facts of the judgment on the cause of the claim, the Defendant is obligated to remove the instant house and warehouse, and deliver the instant site to the Plaintiff, and return the unjust enrichment equivalent to the rent due to the possession and use of the instant site from February 5, 1997 to the completion date of delivery of the instant site, as it owns the instant house and warehouse built on the instant land owned by the Plaintiff, and owns and uses the said part of the instant site (hereinafter “instant site”). Thus, barring any special circumstance, the Defendant is obligated to return the unjust enrichment equivalent to the rent due to the possession and use of the instant site from February 5, 1997

Moreover, the unjust enrichment equivalent to the rent to be returned by the Defendant is the amount calculated by the ratio of KRW 80,000 per annum, the Defendant is the rent for the instant land paid to the owner of the entire land of this case.

However, there is no evidence to prove that the Plaintiff is a difference in the site of this case, even though the Plaintiff claimed that it is money at the rate of KRW 80,000 per month.