beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2014.09.18 2014고단1898

컴퓨터등사용사기

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Seized evidence Nos. 4 and 8 shall be confiscated from the accused.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant: (a) as a member of the shipbuilding of the People’s Republic of China’s nationality, an international telephone financial fraud (hereinafter “Singing”), and (b) as a member of the criminal organization of the international telephone financial fraud (hereinafter “Sing”); (c) made a false statement to the other party to whom the phone was phoneed, on the ground that there was a need to take protective measures for the deposit; (d) obtained information, such as the password of the account from the other party; and (e) transferred money from the other party to the account using it; and (e) made a solicitation to block the fraud by sharing the Defendant’s role of withdrawing the money transferred by receiving the cash card and password of the account from the one hand account in accordance with the method directed by the one who was unable to receive the name; and (e) planned to refrain from committing the “Sing” fraud.

On July 25, 2014, at least 09:00, at a place where a location cannot be known, the person whose name was unknown refers to the victim D, and “The head of the Central District Prosecutors’ Team F investigator. The head of the Central District Prosecutors’ Team F investigator was involved in the case, and the deposit to the new bank account was made safe for three days if all the deposits were withdrawn and deposited to the new bank account. By accessing the central inspection website known to him/her, he/she applied for the prevention of personal information leakage by entering the security card number, resident registration number, name, account number, and password, and by obtaining the OTP card and notifying him/her of the security number.”

However, in fact, the nameless person was not an investigator belonging to the central prosecutor, and the head of the Tong in the name of the victim was not involved in the case, and there was no intention or ability to safely keep the deposits of the victim or prevent the leakage of personal information.

The person under whose name the victim was accused of the victim as above and obtained information from the victim, such as the bank account password and the OTP card number in the name of the victim, and obtained an authorized certificate, and then the new bank of the victim without authority.