A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 2,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

The Defendants respectively.

1. On January 10, 2017, Defendant A, while drinking alcohol from “F” operated by the victim E (F) located in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Seoul-do, around 19:00, Defendant A, without any particular reason, was able to avoid disturbance between approximately 40 minutes, for example, by cutting the mebbbbb, fright at a bar, cutting the son’s disease, cutting the glass room, and putting the victim under restraint.

As such, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s restaurant business by force.

2. Defendant B, at the same time, at the same place as in paragraph 1, and at the same time, Defendant B attempted to arrest the current offender due to interference with the duties by reporting that H was going against a disturbance in the restaurant in Ulsan-do Police Station G District by the Defendant, a member of the Defendant, who was on the duty of the Defendant, at the same time and after receiving 112 reports, and attempted to capture the disturbance from the restaurant in order to obstruct the Defendant’s duty. Defendant B, on the hand floor, h’s blick with his blickum, h’s blick, and hump with his hand.

The Defendant, at the time of the police officer H, obstructed the Defendant’s legitimate execution of duties regarding H’s 112 reporting dispatch and arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement made by H and I;

1. Written statements of J and K;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to a copy of the arrest of a flagrant offender;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and the choice of punishment for the crime;

A. Defendant A: Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act; selection of fines

B. Defendant B: Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act; selection of fines

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act for the attraction of a workhouse;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, respectively, of the order of provisional payment;

1. Defendant A: The provision was made up of the cause of the Defendant B’s crime, but the agreement was made smoothly with the victim during the trial, and other factors such as the Defendant’s punishment records (the fine for driving alcohol in 2008, the fine for the sexual traffic in 2010 and the fine for the same kind of business in 2011), reflectivity, etc.

2. Defendant B: The act of assaulting a police officer who performs legitimate duties concerning the dispatch of report 112 and arrest of flagrant offenders is a challenge to the safety of society, and the defendant.