beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 2016.11.25 2016고단4211

게임산업진흥에관한법률위반

Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for 10 months, Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment for 6 months, Defendant C and D by a fine of 5 million won, respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendants and F conspired to conduct the business of “H” in Silsan-si, Defendant A’s so-called so-called head of the above game room, Defendant B’s day-time head of the above game room, Defendant C’s day-time employee of the above game room, Defendant D’s day-time refund employee of the above game room, and Defendant D’s day-time refund employee of the above game room, to exchange the points they obtain from customers in cash.

No one shall conduct business exchanging tangible or intangible results obtained through the use of game products.

Nevertheless, around November 18, 2015, Defendant A entered into a contract for transfer of the said H game room with I, a business owner of the said H game room, and completed the application for change of name against Simsan. F from December 1, 2015, the same month from December 1, 2015

9. From 18:00 to 18:00, the said H game room had 40 games and 2 games for the purpose of customers. During that process, Defendant B entered the scores obtained as a result of using the said game machine in the subscription ticket by customers. As a result, Defendant C exchanged 10,000 won for the day around the said game room and at night, the amount obtained by deducting 10% of the scores obtained by customers by calculating the points obtained as 10,000 won per point.

As a result, the Defendants in collusion with F to exchange points obtained through the use of game products.

2. No defendant A and F co-principal shall provide game products with any content different from the game products rated for the use thereof;

Nevertheless, Defendant A and F conspired to provide 40 customers with 40 games for new recreation games, which are not obtained from the game management committee, different from the contents classified by the game products management committee, at the time and place mentioned in paragraph (1).

As a result, Defendant A uses game products with contents different from the classified contents in collusion with F.