However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

[Criminal Power] On February 14, 2019, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 1,500,000 as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) from the Busan District Court’s Branch Branch.

【Criminal Facts】

피고인은 2019. 10. 23. 01:57경 부산 북구 B아파트 C동 앞 도로에서, 피의자가 시동을 켠 채 D 아반떼 승용차 안에서 자고 있다는 내용의 112 신고를 받고 현장에 출동한 부산북부경찰서 E지구대 소속 F으로부터, 위 승용차 기어가 “D” 상태로 미등이 켜져 있고, 피고인이 술냄새가 나며 얼굴에 홍조를 띠는 등 술에 취한 상태에서 위 승용차를 운전하였다고 인정할만한 상당한 이유가 있어 같은 날 02:12경부터 02:29경까지 17분간 4차례에 걸쳐 음주측정을 요구받았음에도 음주측정기에 입김을 불어넣는 시늉만 하는 방법으로 이를 거부하여 정당한 사유 없이 경찰공무원의 음주측정 요구에 응하지 아니하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on the results of the crackdown on drinking driving and the circumstantial statement of a drinking driver;

1. Investigation report (Refusal of measurement);

1. Previous records of judgment: Criminal records, inquiry reports, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (verification of suspect driving records);

1. Relevant Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) and (2) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, the Defendant committed the instant crime again, since it has not been much punished due to drinking driving.

However, the defendant shows an attitude to recognize and reflect his mistake, and there is no history of punishment exceeding the fine.

In addition, the age, character and conduct of the defendant, motive, means and result of the crime, circumstances before and after the crime, etc. shall be considered in consideration of all other circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing as shown in the argument in this case.