협박
All of the prosecutions of this case are dismissed.
1. Around February 2, 2017, the summary of the facts charged: (a) the Defendant threatened the victim by saying, “I have a variety of cases where I wish to buy and die, but I do not want to do so so,” on the grounds that I would like to pay the money borrowed from the Defendant by telephone to the Defendant in the Gangnam-gu Seoul Seo-dong, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, and that I would like to pay the money.”
The Defendant, on February 3, 2017, in the “Dur” located in Busan Franchi C around February 17, 2017, to the effect that for the foregoing reasons, the Defendant would spread the sexually related images taken with the victim to the victim.
c) keep a variety of video images stamped with the knowledge of this kind;
Sending the Kakao Stockholm message, “,” etc.
In other words, the victim was threatened.
2. Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts charged of judgment: The crime of non-violation of will under Article 283(3) of the Criminal Act: The judgment dismissing a victim’s non-prosecution of intent on September 15, 2017 (Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act)