If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Around 04:52 on October 11, 2013, the Defendant: (a) on the road in front of the office of a Do individual taxi located in Busan City, 04:52; (b) on the road, the Defendant: (c) took a bath to the slopeF belonging to the Gyeongsan Police Station Emba, which was called “I ice few few few few few few few few few few few few few few few few few few few few few few few few few few few few few few few few few few few few few few few; (d few f)

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police statement-related Acts and subordinate statutes to F;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the defendant, who was sentenced to punishment due to the crime of damage to public goods, committed again the crime of this case within the period of repeated crime after being released, and was sentenced to a fine for obstruction of performance of official duties, a suspended sentence, and there were records of past punishment 30 times as a crime of violence, etc., which are disadvantageous to the defendant, and the defendant is divided and against his mistake, the degree of obstruction of performance of official duties does not seem to be significant; the victim does not want the punishment of the defendant; the victim does not want such punishment in consultation with the victim; the victim does not want such a crime again; and there is a favorable circumstance for the defendant, such as the treatment of the victim's disease with an unidentified in detail, the skin, means and method of the crime of this case, and the symptoms of alcohol dependence, which are favorable to the defendant.