However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. The Defendant brought a lawsuit against the victim D, who is the former wife of the Defendant, thereby impairing the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts by stating that “The victim was able to administer narcotics or take obscene videos in the middle of Seocho-gu Seoul Central District Court 157, the center of Seocho-gu Seoul Central District Court around December 21, 2015, although there was no fact that the victim administered narcotics or taken obscene videos.”

2. On January 25, 2016, around 17:00, the Defendant displayed dynamic images stored in the Defendant’s cell phone by the public service center of the Seoul Central District Court at the above Seoul Central District Court (hereinafter “Seoul Central District Court”) that the Defendant was not the victim, but the Defendant displayed dynamic images stored in the Defendant’s cell phone to the Defendant’s frank G, who was the victim, and damaged the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out false facts.

3. On January 25, 2016, around 17:50 on January 25, 2016, the Defendant showed the video recorded in the Defendant’s cell phone with the video recorded in the Defendant’s cell phone from the foregoing Seoul Central District Court (Seoul Central District Court 357), even though the Defendant was not the victim, the Defendant shows the video recorded in the Defendant’s cell phone to the said G and the victim’s defense counsel, etc., and discussed “C”.

B. On June 30, 2015, the victim’s reputation was damaged by openly pointing out false facts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement made by the witness D in the third public trial records;

1. Witnesses G and E respective legal statements;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. Seizure records (the defendant's defense counsel has no public performance for the establishment of an offense of damaging honor;

The argument is asserted.

At the time of each of the instant remarks, there were many civil petitioners at the time of each of the crimes, and the out of the court is also completed.