소유권말소등기
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. The Defendant became aware of the fact that the Plaintiff was a trend in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and at the time, the Plaintiff was going to play in the Plaintiff’s office while engaging in real estate development in Gyeyang-gu, Gyeonggi-do, and the Plaintiff was recommended from the Plaintiff to purchase the land of Yangyang-gun, Gyeonggi-do at KRW 30,000,000, on a monthly basis, to purchase the forest E 1,390 square meters in Gyeonggi-do.
Accordingly, the Defendant believed the Plaintiff’s horse and purchased E forest land 4,595 square meters per square meter, and paid all the purchase price to the Plaintiff.
In the subsequent month, the Plaintiff used again to purchase the land again to the Defendant, and the Defendant believed the Plaintiff’s horse and calculated the F forest land amounting to KRW 4,959 square meters per square meter and purchased it as KRW 30,000 per square meter.
However, the Plaintiff did not comply with the promise to left large profits from the sale of the original land, which was about 1-2 years thereafter, and the Defendant urged the Plaintiff to sell the land promptly or by telephone at each time. At that time, the Plaintiff failed to comply with the promise to sell the land promptly.
On November 9, 2002, after payment of the purchase price, the land purchased by the Defendant was completed the registration of ownership transfer in the name of G, the Defendant’s wife.
(E) On November 9, 2002, the Plaintiff: (a) on November 9, 2002, filed a registration of partial transfer of co-owners’ shares in the name of the Defendant’s wife on the grounds of sale on October 10, 2002; (b) on the part of the co-owner’s shares in the name of G on December 9, 2002; (c) unlike the Plaintiff’s horse, the Plaintiff would make a registration of partial transfer of co-owner’s shares in the name of G on December 9, 2002; and (d) on April 2005, the Plaintiff, who did not sell the entire co-owner’s shares to the amount of money in bulk, was guilty of failing to comply with the agreement and compensate for damages instead of the agreement.
Therefore, on October 31, 2002, concerning the real estate of this case owned by the plaintiff.