beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.04.06 2016나65428

구상금

Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Under the National Health Insurance Act, the Plaintiff is a non-profit public interest corporation established to manage and operate health insurance for the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of, and rehabilitation from, the disease and injury of the people, as well as for childbirth, death, and health promotion. A is a policyholder who has purchased the Plaintiff's national health insurance.

The defendant is an insurer who has concluded an agency driver insurance contract that covers only the personal injury II, the personal injury, personal bodily injury, and the vehicle (motor vehicle on behalf of the representative) between the National Association driving in which B belongs.

B. On December 3, 2009, B, an agent driver for traffic accident, is the Defendant’s vehicle not exceeding C’s Karen car (hereinafter “Defendant’s vehicle”) owned by C around 22:00.

In order to drive the apartment road in front of the Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, in order to drive the apartment road in front of the apartment in front of the transfer road along the three-lanes from the distance room of transfer to the side of the sloping, the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the A driver's two-lanes of the same direction, due to the error that the two-lanes changed rapidly to the one-lanes in order to drive the U.S., the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the A driver's two-lanes of the vehicle, and the latter conflicts with the latter part of the left-hand mother portion of the Defendant'

c. The Plaintiff’s insurance benefits and reimbursement claim 1) The Plaintiff received medical treatment from December 3, 2009 to November 23, 2015 due to the instant accident. The Plaintiff’s medical treatment charges, excluding A’s personal expenses paid from January 26, 2015 to the above F Hospital, etc., are the aggregate of the medical treatment charges of the Corporation during the period from January 26, 2015 to May 4, 2015; 202, 398, 640, 080, 060, 1 to June 1, 2015, 205; 205, 201, 204, 204, 205, 1 to 305, 181, 206, 1 to 481, 205, 2015, 1 to 185, 2016.

2 As to KRW 42,386,640 of the Corporation’s charges paid for A during the period from July 1, 2012 to November 1, 2014, the Plaintiff filed against the Defendant, the Seoul Central District Court on April 23, 2015.