However, each of the above defendants is against the defendants for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

1. Interference with Defendant A’s business;

A. The Defendant, from around 04:30 on September 28, 2013 to 05:00 on the same day, was under the influence of the victim E’s business from around 04:30 on the same day, and without any justifiable reason, obstructed the victim’s infringing duty by a force of 30 minutes, by preventing the Defendant from entering the customers who want to enter the scene, such as making a brucing to the victim’s business site “a malicious seat, wumk, and wumk.”

B. The Defendant from October 7, 2013 to the same month.

8. From 00:40 to 00, the victim took a bath to the effect that, while under the influence of alcohol in front of the above F, he saw the customers entering the inn part of the entrance operated by the victim as a big interest, he interfered with the victim’s influence by force for about three hours by putting the disturbance on the entrance of the entrance, such as lyings on the front of the entrance, and preventing them from entering the entrance of the guest.

2. 피고인 B의 공무집행방해 피고인은 2013. 10. 8. 00:40경 위 F 앞에서 영업을 방해한다는 112신고를 접하고 신고 출동한 G 파출소 순경 H 외 1명이 A을 업무방해 혐의로 현행범 체포하려고 하자 “야이 경찰관 새끼들아. 가만히 안놔둬. 그만하라고. 가만두지 않을 꺼야.”라고 소리를 치면서 순경 H의 우측 등허리 부위를 발로 걷어찼다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties by police officers on criminal investigations.

3. From October 6, 2013 to October 6, 02:10 on the same day, the Defendants, who interfered with the duties of the Defendants, she dumped to the ground floor of the above F and the surrounding alley, and dumped to drinking, and she she shed to the victim E, who was not good among the customers, for every time when they enter the F, operated by the victim E, and she she shed to “a person who is able to be her funeral in the same year and yachting year.”