However, from the date of the conclusion of the judgment, the Defendants are above two years from the date of the judgment.

Defendant

A and Defendant B, within the main point of “E” located in Pyeongtaek-si D on January 11, 2018, around 22:00, performed drinking together with the victim F (e.g., age 63). In order to confirm whether the victim sent and received the message to Defendant A’s annual Guide, and whether the victim and G were dead, the victim forced the victim to take the cell phone from the victim to check the contents of the cell phone message.

Accordingly, the Defendants entered the victim’s residence in Pyeongtaek-si No. 302 on January 12, 2018, and Defendant A entered the victim’s residence in Pyeongtaek-si No. 302, and Defendant A entered the excessive charged facts in the kitchen at the kitchen at the location of the Plaintiff, but according to the victim’s statement (in the investigation record 17 pages), seizure protocol (in the investigation record 24 pages), seizure photograph (in the investigation record 26 pages), and the photograph of seized articles (in the investigation record), the Defendants’ use of excessive amount is recognized, and such alteration is made ex officio.

(18 cm in length, 8 cm in length)

As the victim's brushes towards the victim's brushes, the victim could not resist by threatening, and Defendant B could not resist the victim, and Defendant B took one of the LG smartphones equivalent to KRW 500,000 at the market price of the victim's brushed by the victim's brushes, and went together with Defendant A.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to take a deadly weapon and forcibly taken the victim's property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement made by the police with respect to F;

1. Criminal tools and field photographs;

1. Each protocol of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Photographs of seized articles;

1. Photographs of damaged articles;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 334 (2), (1), 333, and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of criminal facts;

1. The Defendants were able to voluntarily attend the Gyeonggi-gu Police Station (see, e.g., investigation records 60, 61, 93). Articles 52(1) and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. Judgment on the assertion of defense counsel under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Code of the Suspension of Execution