명예훼손
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
1. The court below acquitted the Defendant of this part of the facts charged even though it is difficult to see the Defendant’s statement on the grounds of the prosecutor’s appeal as a public interest. The court below erred by misapprehending the legal principles.
2. Determination
A. The Defendant was the president of “D” in 2013, who is a friendship group consisting of 20 women in the instant facts charged, and the president of “D” in October 2014, 2014, and 4 female members, including F and victims G, including themselves, who were members of F and 1-2 years before around October 2014. There were four rooms, and one male and one female were used for the same room, and he was not able to sleep with the male and one female.
However, the victim took a warning that he/she went to the way to get his/her partner to leave, and the defendant is likely to dismiss a member who is morally at a meeting where all members of the D's child mixed with one and participate in the meeting to get his/her own partner.
The decision was made on November 10, 2014 by notifying the president in 2014 to order the victims, etc. at the meeting of the superintendent group.
On November 18, 2014, at the monthly meeting of the above gathering held in an unclaimed cafeteria near I located in Busan Dong-gu, Busan on November 18, 2014, the Defendant refused, however, the Defendant, from among 15-16 members including the victim, “(E)” against the victim, among 15-16 members including J and K, to do so.
In addition, the word E, which sees as low, after being put in the room, can be seen as being.
하는 줄 아나 E 가 하는 말이 그때 G가 그 방에 남자가 부르니까 호호 하고 따라 들어가는데”, “그래 가지고 그 뒷날 공을 쳤는지 어 쨌는지 모르겠고 나왔는데, 딱 보니까 밥을 먹고 이러는데 G가 벌써 지 파트너한테 ‘ 자기야, 아!’ 하고 입에 다가 뭘 넣어 주고 그래 하더란다.
“A victim, E, F, etc., such as “”.