The judgment below

In light of the records, the court below is just in finding that the primary facts charged in this case constitute a case where there is no proof of facts constituting the crime, and contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, the court below did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of logic and experience and free evaluation of evidence, or by misapprehending the legal principles as to "other goods" under Article 269 (3) 2 of the Customs Act, as alleged in the grounds of appeal.

On the other hand, the prosecutor filed an appeal against the guilty portion of the judgment below, but the prosecutor did not state specific grounds for objection to this part in the petition of appeal or the reasoning of appeal.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.