When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

[Criminal Power] On December 1, 2008, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 700,000,000 as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act, at the port branch of the Daegu District Court.

【Criminal Facts】

At around 00:10 on May 30, 2020, the Defendant driven an E-Appurn-turged vehicle in the direction of approximately 5km alcohol concentration of about 0.056% from the north-gu B apartment road in the north-gu, Mapo-si to the front of the Dic Association located in the same Gu C.

Accordingly, the defendant violated the prohibition of drinking driving more than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on the result of crackdown on drinking driving and on the circumstantial statement of a drinking driver;

1. Previous convictions indicated in the judgment: Relevant provisions of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning criminal records and investigation reports (verification of criminal records of the same kind as suspects); 1. Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act (Article 148-2 (1) of the Act on the Election of Criminal Crimes and the Selection of Punishment) (Article 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act (Article 148-2 (1) of the Election of Fines and the misunderstanding

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;